Why is animal testing unnecessary

Animals and humans differ considerably with regard to anatomy, physiology and metabolism.Despite all the disputes and discussions regarding whether or not animal testing is actually necessary, they wouldn't change the fact that it is, in fact, an extremely cruel thing to do.Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 bc.Animal testing is an unnecessary part of science that should be gotten rid of completely.For example skin irritation can be measured with a skin alternative such as epiderm.Urge texas a&m to stop funding cruel experiments on dogs 2.

It violates a code of ethics.It is because of the fact that animal physiology, anatomy, and metabolism are not the same as the physiology, anatomy, and metabolism of people.By eliana, london · april 11, 2019 pic:The suffering that animals unwillingly endure in our experiments and tests is unnecessary and cruel.Animal testing is unreliable and unnecessary the findings of animal experimentation are not reliable and conclusive.There is no need for it.

Animal testing is unsafe for humans and nonhuman animals, unreliable, inefficient, and outdated.It is often claimed that animal testing is indispensable, because a »complete organism« is supposedly required for the development of pharmaceutical drugs.One particular instance that demonstrates unnecessary and inhumane treatment of animals for testing is the use of rabbits for the draize test.