Is double standard a logical fallacy

This is used in argumentation to unfairly support or reject an argument.This is different from a subjective argument or one that can be disproven with facts;A double standard is defined as:In the classic distinction among material fallacies, cognitive fallacies, and formal fallacies, special pleading most likely falls within the category of a cognitive fallacy, because it.But not every argument is perfect.In the early 1970s, two behavioral researchers, daniel kahneman and amos tversky pioneered the field of behavioral economics through their work with cognitive biases and heuristics, which like logical fallacies, deal with errors in reasoning.the main difference, however, is that logical fallacies require an argument whereas cognitive biases and heuristics (mental shortcuts) refer to our.

Argumentum ad baculum an argument that resorts to the threat of force to cause the acceptance of the conclusion.If 'relevance' and 'double standards' seem a little too ambiguous, the iep article on fallacies offers the following summary:Special pleading is a logical fallacy wherein a double standard is employed by the person making the assertion.A double standard is a principle or policy that is applied in a different manner to similar things, without proper justification.Person 1 unfairly rejects reason y,… read more »double standard summaryEssentially, this means that a double standard occurs when two or more things, such as individuals or groups, are treated differently, when they should be treated the same way.